Mueller report found no evidence of Trump collusion with Russia

Very large text size

Nothing in the Justice Department's regulations on special counsels would prevent Barr from releasing Mueller's report once certain material is redacted, including classified matters and information about continuing law enforcement operations. But Barr has cited the department's policies against publicly criticising someone who isn't indicted - and against indicting a sitting president.

and Michael Flynn, who became his first national security adviser - though none admitted to conspiring with Russian operatives. He also indicted more than two dozen Russian hackers and military intelligence officers.While Mueller didn't seek an indictment of Trump or members of his family, they're not necessarily in the clear.

But Barr suggested during his confirmation hearing in February that he might exclude any criticism of Trump and others who weren't charged with crimes from the information he'd share with Congress.

How’s StephenAtHome Colbert going to take it?

'No evidence' and 'insufficient evidence to indict' are two very different things. Guess which one is applicable here

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ... How devastating for all his haters.

This is NOT what the release states.

'The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.' Anything involving not making a traditional prosecutorial judgement (Barrs words) from a prosecutor is going to be interesting reading.

What a surprise. No collusion.. To coin a famous Australian term... Suffer in your jocks

This must have really hurt you to type that.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mueller report found no evidence of Trump collusion with RussiaSpecial Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion with Russia, but made no conclusion on possible obstruction of justice by the President, according to the US Attorney-General. Look a bit harder. That’s a lazy and incorrect headline. It should read “Burr’s summary of the report indicates no evidence of collusion”. All the people still in disillusion about HillaryClinton losing will not accept the report. The same people will say JFK was assassinated by Men in Black hiding ET’s in Area 51!
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

Mueller sends Russia probe report to US Attorney GeneralSpecial Counsel Robert Mueller has handed in a keenly awaited report on his investigation into Russia's role in the 2016 presidential election and any potential wrongdoing by U.S. President Donald Trump, the Justice Department said on Friday. Must be a fake report cause there's been no leak. That's a first for Washington. Must be a blank piece of paper And the only reason this was dropped on a Friday night is ,,,,, there is no Trump-Russia collusion, how embarrassing for the alt-left media.
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »

Mueller report 'does not exonerate' Trump of obstruction of justice | Sky News AustraliaThe Mueller report into suspected collusion between Donald Trump and Russia has found there is no evidence that the president committed a crime.\n\nHowever, the report also does not exonerate the president of obstruction of justice - leaving the door open for potential impeachment.\n\nAccording to the chairman of the US House judiciary committee, Jerry Nadler, the report 'is putting matters squarely in Congress' court'.\n\nSpecial counsel Robert Mueller has spent almost two years examining Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.\n\nHis investigation has not found that the Trump campaign or its associated 'conspired or coordinated' with Russia, according to a letter sent to Congress which summarises the findings.\n\n\n\n\n OmarJimenezCNN Mueller is only covering his own ass OmarJimenezCNN Fake news OmarJimenezCNN Pffft from CNN!
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »