Toronto doctors sued for allegedly ignoring veteran's wishes to stay alive

  • 📰 CTVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 99%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A civil trial is set to begin this week for two doctors accused of ignoring an elderly man's wishes to stay alive and allegedly imposing a 'do not resuscitate' order without consulting him or his substitute decision-maker.

Two Toronto doctors are facing a $2.2-million civil lawsuit alleging that they failed to respect a patient's wish to stay alive.TORONTO -- A civil trial is set to begin this week for two doctors accused of ignoring an elderly man's wishes to stay alive and allegedly imposing a "do not resuscitate" order without consulting him or his substitute decision-maker.

Lawyers representing Livingston and Chapman did not comment on the upcoming civil trial, which is set to start Monday. Both parties said the 88-year-old had several serious conditions in 2008, including diabetes, kidney failure and gangrene. Some of those declarations took place once DeGuerre was admitted to Toronto's Sunnybrook Hospital in a wing designated for veterans, the statement said.

"Unbeknownst to DeGuerre or the plaintiff, Livingstone and Chapman altered DeGuerre's plan of treatment ... by changing his status from full code to do not resuscitate," the claim alleged. "The change in DeGuerre's code status to DNR was made ... without the consent of DeGuerre or the plaintiff." The statement said Wawrzyniak, a registered nurse, tried administering help herself, but was unsuccessful and DeGuerre died a short time later.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Sunnybook doctors.....no surprise to me 😥. I wouldn't take my dog there after my experience with them over a 6 year time period. I have filed a complaint against two doctors in charge of my care and am awaiting the ruling of CPSO next month.

They should be given the electric chair!

Doctors should only be able to advise the patient and their family of end of life options, I didn’t know that they could apply DNR status on their patients behalf. That should never be the case, why should the doctor be allowed to make decisions contrary to the patient’s wishes?

If there is no chance for recovery, ever, why would a family member want to extend the suffering of a loved one? Being kept alive is not the same as living.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trial to begin Monday in Toronto for two doctors accused of ignoring an elderly man’s wishes to stay aliveThe $2.2-million suit against Dr. Donald Livingston and Dr. Martin Chapman accuses the physicians of negligence or malpractice in the death of Second World War veteran Douglas DeGuerre.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

European Union to ignore U.S. calls to ban Huawei, but still monitoring cybersecurity risksWhile the guidance from the European Commission does not have legal force, it will carry political weight which can eventually lead to national legislation in EU countries globebusiness One of the few times I agree with the EU and government intervention in the economy. BendahanL globebusiness Just in case. You will never know. 😎
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »