Feldman: On bump stocks, the Supreme Court is divorced from reality

The Supreme Court is considering whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is right to define guns equipped with bump stocks as machine guns.

The whole sorry spectacle reminded me of the long-running debate about whether to allow television cameras into the Supreme Court to cover oral argument. Court insiders have long commented wryly that, if the cameras were allowed, the public would soon discover just how technical, dry and boring oral arguments really are.

The trouble is that none of the justices was prepared to say that the way to get the right meaning of the statute is to ask its purpose. That’s because the justices, over the last couple of decades, have fallen into the thrall of a truly dysfunctional theory of statutory interpretation, one known as textualism.

Stephen Breyer, now retired, was the last justice to state openly that he believed in the central importance of legislative purpose. His former law clerk, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, ought to openly take up that mantle now. She did her best in the oral argument, focusing on the word “function” and claiming that the word should be understood broadly.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Docs on Supreme Court Justices' Travel Fuel Reform DemandsJessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Texas and Florida social media lawsThese cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Justices Sotomayor and Barrett Assure Americans Supreme Court Isn’t PartisanSee multiple perspectives from The Hill, Washington Examiner, and Politico at AllSides.com.
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court left-liberal justices say Trump ruling erodes ‘insurrection’ clauseThe Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Donald Trump should remain on state primary ballots despite a moderate disagreement from Democratic-appointed justices.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Two state Supreme Court justices face contested November electionsTwo Supreme Court justices face challengers in elections this year, and three people are running for an open seat on the Court of Appeals.
Source: MSTODAYnews - 🏆 275. / 63 Read more »

SOTU: Biden Goes Off Script to Scold Supreme Court Justices Over DobbsSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »