The US Supreme Court seems torn over whether to trigger a radical transformation of the internet. The nation’s highest court heard arguments Monday over state laws in Florida and Texas that restrict how platforms like Facebook and YouTube moderate speech. If the court lets them take effect, social media feeds could look very different, with platforms forced to carry unsavory or hateful content that today is blocked or removed.
The high stakes gave long-standing questions about free speech and online regulation new urgency in Monday’s arguments. Are social platforms akin to newspapers, which have First Amendment protections that give them editorial control over content—or are they common carriers, like phone providers or telegraph companies, that are required to transmit protected speech without interference? A ruling is expected by June, when the court typically issues many decisions, and could have sweeping effects on how social sites like Facebook, YouTube, X, and TikTok do business beyond Florida and Texa
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: ALNewsNetwork - 🏆 583. / 51 Read more »
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »
Source: MSTODAYnews - 🏆 275. / 63 Read more »
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »