Minn. Justices Appear Skeptical of States Deciding Trump's Eligibility for Ballot

  • 📰 NEWSMAX
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 71%

Law Law Headlines News

Minnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should...

Minnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should prevent him from running.

The Minnesota lawsuit and another in Colorado, where a similar hearing is playing out, are among several filed around the country to bar Trump from state ballots in 2024 over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, which was intended to halt Congress' certification of Democrat Joe Biden's 2020 win. The Colorado and Minnesota cases are furthest along, putting one or both on an expected path to the U.S. Supreme Court.

An attorney representing Trump, Nicholas Nelson, said states' roles in determining candidates' eligibility for president was limited to what he called "basic processing requirements,” such as determining whether they meet the age requirement. A core issue in the cases is how to define an insurrection under the amendment, a question that was debated at some length during Thursday's arguments in Minnesota.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 16. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Minnesota justices appear skeptical that states should decide Trump's eligibility for the ballotMinnesota Supreme Court justices appear skeptical states have the authority to block ex-President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Minnesota justices appear skeptical that states should decide Trump's ballot eligibilityMinnesota Supreme Court justices suggest Congress should decide whether Trump is ineligible to run under the Constitution's 'insurrection' clause.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Minnesota Supreme Court justices appear skeptical that states can block Trump from 2024 ballotMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should prevent him from running.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Minnesota justices appear skeptical that states should decide Trump's eligibility for the ballotinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot.
Source: DenverChannel - 🏆 239. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court justices heard a case about Trump (sort of)Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »