Donald Trump fined for violating gag orders during his News York civil fraud trial

  • 📰 SkyNewsAust
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 13 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 78%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Former US president Donald Trump has been fined more than $15,000 for violating gag orders during his New York civil fraud trial. The fine came after he made comments to the media, calling the judge a “very partisan” judge. Earlier today, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, testified for the second day in a row against the former president.

Former US president Donald Trump has been fined more than $15,000 for violating gag orders during his New York civil fraud trial.

Earlier today, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, testified for the second day in a row against the former president.New York Attorney General Letitia James is suing the former president, his company and his two sons for $396 million.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 7. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

‘Blatant’ violation: Donald Trump fined $US10,000 for violating gag orderJustice Arthur Engoron last week fined Trump $US5000 after finding that he had not taken down a post disparaging the judge’s law clerk.
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »

‘Blatant’ violation: Donald Trump fined $US10,000 for violating gag orderJustice Arthur Engoron last week fined Trump $US5000 after finding that he had not taken down a post disparaging the judge’s law clerk.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

‘Blatant’ violation: Donald Trump fined $US10,000 for violating gag orderJustice Arthur Engoron last week fined Trump $US5000 after finding that he had not taken down a post disparaging the judge’s law clerk.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »