Anti-Abortion Justice to Hear Case Deciding Abortion Legality in Arizona

  • 📰 truthout
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 57 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Experts say his past comments could be grounds for recusing himself from the abortion ban case, which he has not done.

Abortion rights protesters chant during a rally at the U.S. District Court of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona, on July 4, 2022.

In 2012, while defending a 20-week abortion ban, Montgomery argued that abortion should be totally banned, citing “the inherent human dignity in a life at the moment of conception,” remarksIn 2016, Montgomery also received a $1,000 donation from Cathi Herrod, the head of as anti-abortion organization Center for Arizona Policy, which was disclosed in a campaign finance report.

Still, Montgomery’s remarks are noteworthy, said Meriam Seifter, a professor of law at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, pointing to his specific remarks against Planned Parenthood. That specific public animus toward a party in the case, rather than toward abortion in general, could strengthen the argument in favor of his recusal.

In Ohio, where the Supreme Court is weighing the constitutionality of a six-week ban, Justice Pat DeWine is the son of Republican state Gov. Mike DeWine, whowas overturned — said in judicial candidate questionnaires by the organization Cincinnati Right to Life that the U.S. Constitution did not include a right to an abortion, statements that prompted criticism from Ohio legal ethics scholars.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 69. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Anti-abortion groups sue San Antonio over new Reproductive Justice FundA group of anti-abortion activists, including Texas Right to Life and the San Antonio Family Association, has sued to shut down San Antonio's recently launched Reproductive Justice Fund, which distributes city funds to nonprofits offering reproductive care.
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »

Anti-abortion groups sue San Antonio over “reproductive justice fund”The city allocated $500,000 to establish a reproductive justice fund, but has not yet said how that money will be used. The lawsuit asks a judge to block the money from going to groups that pay for out-of-state abortions.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »

Anti-abortion groups sue San Antonio over “reproductive justice fund”The city allocated $500,000 to establish a reproductive justice fund, but has not yet said how that money will be used. The lawsuit asks a judge to block the money from going to groups that pay for out-of-state abortions.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Anti-abortion groups sue City of San Antonio over ‘Reproductive Justice Fund’A pair of anti-abortion groups have sued the City of San Antonio over its newly created, still undefined “Reproductive Justice Fund,” which they worry could help women access out-of-state abortions.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »