Legal challenge told Glasgow LEZ is 'unnecessary'

  • 📰 BBCWestScot
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A lawyer claims most air quality targets had been met prior to new low emission zone rules.

A new legal challenge to Glasgow's low emission zone has claimed the measure was illegal and unnecessary.

The second phase of the scheme - which started operating in June - aims to improve air quality by limiting which vehicles can enter the area. The report found that air quality aims were achieved in phase one and the second phase impacting other vehicles would not lead to any further improvement in air quality.

He told the hearing that 25 out of 27 of the stations had recorded "downwards trends" of NO2 in recent years.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 85. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Glasgow City Council acted unlawfully over LEZ, court hearsLOCAL authority chiefs had no proper legal justification to allow a “illegal” and “draconian” low emission zone scheme to operate in…
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »

Glasgow's 'draconian' low emission zone had no legal justification, court hearsAdvocate Lord Davidson of Glen Clova KC told judge Lady Poole at the Court of Session that Glasgow City Council's low emission zone scheme was 'illegal' and 'draconian'.
Source: Glasgow_Live - 🏆 4. / 97 Read more »