Vanessa Amorosi’s memory was so poor that her evidence in court cannot be relied upon, a barrister for the singer’s mother argued on Friday.
Referring to a 2005 letter in which a law firm claimed it had been instructed that a property on Boundary Road, Narre Warren – bought through the trust Vanjoy in 2001 – “really does belong to Joy in its entirety”, Amorosi said she had never seen the document until it was shown to her recently by her solicitor, despite the fact she was listed as a recipient.
Amorosi’s testimony throughout the proceeding has been that she placed her trust unquestioningly in the idea that her mother was acting in her interests from the moment her career began to take off in 1999 until the pair fell out in late 2014. Amorosi was then forced to sell her home in the US because there were insufficient funds available to service the debt.At the time, Llama, the trust through which most of the singer’s assets were held, carried a mortgage of $1.
The issue of Amorosi’s patchy recall is crucial to the case because of a “kitchen agreement” that Robinson insists was struck in February 2001 in the family’s then home.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »