“Do not refer to militants, soldiers or anyone else as ‘terrorists.’ The notion of terrorism remains heavily politicized and is part of the story.” – Canadian Broadcasting Corporation directiveNumerous mainstream media outlets here in the U.S., in Canada, and overseas have been hit with intense criticism this week after various analyses of their coverage have shown their refusal to use the word “terrorists” to describe Hamas terrorists after thehttps://t.
Simpson elaborated on his Twitter page in a tweet that got Community Noted to show that “absolute neutrality” was not required according toBritish politicians know perfectly well why the BBC avoids the word ‘terrorist’, and over the years plenty of them have privately agreed with it. Calling someone a terrorist means you’re taking sides and ceasing to treat the situation with due impartiality.
“Do not refer to militants, soldiers, or anyone else as ‘terrorists,’” the memo states, emphasizing “do not” with bold type. “The notion of terrorism remains heavily politicized and is part of the story. Even when quoting/clipping a government or a source referring to fighters as ‘terrorists,’ we should add context to ensure the audience understands this is opinion, not fact. That includes statements from the Canadian government and Canadian politicians.
The memo originated from George Achi, Director of Journalistic Standards at the public broadcaster. It also cautions CBC journalists not to refer to 2005 as “the end of the occupation” of Gaza, “as Israel has maintained control over airspace, seafront and virtually all movement into or out of the area.”
We have just obtained what appears to be a leaked email written by CBC employee George Achi instructing reporters to: