The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting

. Arguments taking place at the high court on Wednesday will focus on a coastal district that is held by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace. In January, a lower court ordered the district redrawn after finding that Republicans who control the state Legislature improperly moved Democratic-leaning Black voters into another district to make the seat safer for Mace in 2022. When Mace first won election in 2020, she edged Democratic incumbent Rep. Joe Cunningham by 1%, under 5,400 votes.

The state's new map will give Alabama two congressional districts where Black voters comprise a substantial portion of the electorate. A similar pending Louisiana case could lead to a second mostly Black district there, too. In South Carolina, Black voters wouldn’t be as numerous in a redrawn district. But combined with a substantial set of Democratic-leaning white voters, Democrats could be competitive in the reconfigured district.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering disputeThe Supreme Court will consider whether the lines of South Carolina's Congressional District 1 are an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

South Carolina Democrat's House bid runs through US Supreme CourtSouth Carolina Democrat Michael B. Moore, the great- great-grandson of a Black Civil War hero and pioneering 19th century congressman, is aiming to help his party retake control of the U.S. House of Representatives from Republicans in 2024.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court could drop California's shield for doctors who mail abortion pillsCalifornia's new law protecting in-state doctors and pharmacists who prescribe and provide the abortion pill to out-of-state patients could be upended by the Supreme Court if the justices choose to review the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

How the 19th Century Supreme Court Set Us on a Path to AuthoritarianismIn 1883, the Supreme Court refused to do away with racial segregation. And that’s helped set the stage for today’s massive resistance to multiracial power.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

The 'soft dictatorship' of this Supreme CourtWith the nine justices reconvened for the fall term, SFGATE columnist Drew Magary is here to remind us all to stay angry and demand change.
Source: SFGate - 🏆 534. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court Should Rein In the Administrative State in CFPB Case | OpinionIf ever there was a poster child for the progressive vision of an unaccountable administrative state, it's the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »