‘Serious harm’ test should be considered for all defamation cases – Oireachtas committee report

  • 📰 IrishTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 36 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 98%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Judge should have the final say on the amount of any damages, justice committee recommends

Oireachtas justice committee says a judge should have the final say on damages in High Court defamation actions but juries should continue to hear them. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni/Collins

Other recommendations include for simplification of the public interest defence in defamation cases and for defamation to be actionable only if special damage is proven. As part of its scrutiny, the committee heard submissions from interested parties, including retired High Court judge Bernard Barton, who managed the High Court’s defamation list over several years; the Bar of Ireland; the Department of Justice; media organisations; the National Union of Journalists; and an umbrella group for organisations opposing SLAPP litigation.

Other recommendations include for introduction of a system that specifically incentivises the use of mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Retaining juries in defamation cases ‘a victory for democracy’Retired High Court judge Bernard Barton welcomes findings of Oireachtas report into proposed legislation
Source: businessposthq - 🏆 8. / 71 Read more »