Judge demands more answers from Roger Stone about his Russia book and gag order

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal judge reprimanded Roger Stone over possible violations of a court-imposed gag order that could ultimately land him in jail.

A federal judge reprimanded Roger Stone on Tuesday over possible violations of a court-imposed gag order that could ultimately land him in jail. She also gave the longtime associate of President Donald Trump a week to explain why the re-release of a book he wrote critical of the Russia investigation wasn’t previously disclosed.

Berman on Tuesday slammed Stone for not disclosing the re-release in earlier court appearances and even suggested in a footnote that Stone was using court filings to “generate additional publicity for the book.

Even so, she said, Stone had “multiple opportunities to bring his then-existing plan to disseminate his views about the Special Counsel to the Court’s attention” and she pointed out that Stone’s gag order had been crafted with the input of his lawyers.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Lock him up!!!

👏👏👏👏👏

Just lock him up already.

He did it just before the gag order. Ass.

Don't do this again, if he does he may have to get another warning . Contemptuous! WTF

caschmitt Can we through the king of white privilege in jail please?

The U.S. Criminal Justice System does NOT apply to rich old white men. Black men should disobey ALL laws NOT imposed on white men! CNN MSNBC NBCNews nytimes AP CBSNews Reuters nypost NewYorker NYDailyNews PBS washingtonpost NPR McClatchyDC MSNBCPR CNNPR

If he gets another pass....

What's taking so long to get this guy an Orange jumpsuit?

The blatant disregard for the rule of law cannot go unpunished - this is the case for Stone and POTUS justice Accountability

Seems like a reasonable thing for the judge to do, and yet, the author makes a point of noting that the judge is an Obama appointee. Is the subtext here that the judge might be nothing more than a political hack?

Is that his real face?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines