Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice refuses to disclose names of others looking at impeachment

  • 📰 sdut
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 95%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

One of three former Wisconsin Supreme Court justices asked to review possible impeachment of a current justice is refusing to tell a judge who else was looking into that question

of liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz if she does not recuse herself from a pair of redistricting lawsuits.was violating the state open meetings law by not letting the public attend its meetings. Prosser is the only former justice to say publicly that he is among the group.

When asked directly by the judge if he would name who the other two former justices were, Prosser said, “No.” Likewise, Vos attorney Matthew Fernholz said he would not disclose their names without first consulting with Vos. Vos has repeatedly declined to name who he asked, only saying he tabbed three former justices to look into impeachment.

Vos said he was asking the group to “come back with an analysis to say whether or not is possible and how it should occur.” “It could be very well, Justice Prosser, that this is not a committee that is not subject to public meetings law,” Remington said. “We just don’t know because the facts are uncertain.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice refuses to disclose names of others looking at impeachmentOne of three former Wisconsin Supreme Court justices asked to review possible impeachment of a current justice is refusing to tell a judge who else was looking into that question.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Wisconsin Supreme Court won't hear longshot case trying to head off impeachmentThe Wisconsin Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit seeking an order blocking any attempt from the state Legislature to impeach Justice Janet Protasiewicz
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Wisconsin Supreme Court won't hear longshot case trying to head off impeachmentThe Wisconsin Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit seeking an order blocking any attempt from the state Legislature to impeach Justice Janet Protasiewicz.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Michigan Supreme Court orders all judges to use people’s preferred pronouns in courtThe Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered all judges to address people in court by the pronouns they use or by “other respectful means.”
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Seattle asks Supreme Court to review decision that makes encampment sweeps more difficultThe decision blocks camping bans unless a city can provide shelter beds for every homeless person in the area.
Source: KIRO7Seattle - 🏆 271. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Could Trigger Hundreds of Billions in Corporate Tax Cuts 'With the Stroke of Pen'A new report warns that huge tax gifts for corporations and 'a $340 billion hole in the federal budget' are among the potential consequences of a case SCOTUS is set to hear in December.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »