Quebec Court of Appeal rules companies can suffer cruel and unusual punishment

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 92%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Court of Appeal sided with the company, with one of the three judges who heard the case dissenting

The Quebec Court of Appeal has ruled that the Charter protection against cruel and unusual punishment can apply to companies as well as individuals.

The numbered company sought to have the minimum fine in the law struck down. It invoked Section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which states, “Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.”In a decision rendered Monday, the Court of Appeal sided with the company, with one of the three judges who heard the case dissenting.

But Court of Appeal Justice Dominique Belanger, writing for the majority, said she is not convinced Section 12 refers only to “human dignity.” She noted that companies have successfully invoked other Charter protections in the past. She said she does not believe that Canadian society would find it acceptable for a company to be driven into bankruptcy by a disproportionate fine, “thereby jeopardizing the rights of its creditors or forcing layoffs.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

That's I am converting myself to a company. I will pay less tax and get better protection!

What a load...I'm sure the other contractors that set themselves up properly and paid the appropriate set up fees will be happy...

Quebec is “unique & distinct “. A society where corruption is “normal”

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Quebec Court of Appeal upholds ruling ordering tobacco companies to pay billions in damagesThe companies must pay approximately $17-billion in damages to 100,000 Quebec smokers who developed diseases as a result of cigarettes or who couldn’t quit smoking Bet they don't do this in any other province.... Look into that eh guys? lol Now we need to look at the reports that producers of opiods understated their dangers to the doctors prescribing them. Make sense? OpioidEpidemic BigPharma I hope you're watching nsgov Why let QC pocket billions and NS gets $0?
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

LIVE: Decision on lawsuit against big tobaccoReaction to the Quebec Court of Appeal decision on a Class Action suit against tobacco companies.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Tobacco companies lose appeal of ruling ordering them to pay $16B in damages to Quebec smokersA lawyer for smokers who brought the class action called the decision a complete victory, and estimated after the appeal ruling, total damages would reach $17B Why only qweerbeck!!!!!!!!!! Why!!!!!! How is this $16B settlement only going to Quebec smokers? It's a bad lawsuit, but why aren't the rest of Canada involved in the settlement? Don't say, only Quebec cares, because Ontario has more ambulance chaser then Quebec. Line of the article: 'Imperial Tobacco, JTI-Macdonald and Rothmans-Benson & Hedges had appealed a ruling that found the companies chose profits over the health of their customers.'
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

Appeals Court upholds ruling ordering $17B in damages to Quebec smokersThe Quebec Court of Appeal has upheld a landmark judgment that ordered three tobacco companies to pay billions of dollars in damages to Quebec smokers. Of course... the courts ruling in favour of giving Quebec free hand outs again. I’m not surprised. These tobacco companies should tell this judge to eat it. Smoking was their choice. I agree with commenter above - smoking is/was their choice. Typical times we live in - no one ever has to take responsibility for their bad behaviour. Sue the product maker or service provider. Get the lawyers involved. Smoking is a bad habit, an addiction. Own your problem! Is it because they didnt have french pictures on the cigarette packs to show them what was going to happen to them? This ruling is stupid. chioces
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

3 Tobacco Firms Ordered To Pay Smokers Who Couldn't Quit: Quebec CourtSmokers who got sick from the products are also qualify for payments So can the drug dealers be sued for getting people addicted as well. The idea that.smoking is bad has been around for a long time.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »

Appeals Court upholds landmark tobacco rulingThe Quebec Court of Appeal has upheld a landmark judgment that ordered three tobacco companies to pay billions of dollars in damages to Quebec smokers. It will go to the Supreme Court don’t count you money yet Quebec ! Why only Quebec? I used to smoke. And to not know it's going to harm you is ludicrous.
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »

Court clears way for major B.C. mine-drilling project on First Nations landsThe Tsilhqot’in Nation had appealed a ruling that upheld the approval of an exploratory drilling program on their land near Williams Lake, but the B.C. Court of Appeal rejected that appeal. About time. That said I think First Nations people should negotiate for a % of all resource industry profits. Trudeau gives billions to people that despise us while natives don’t have potable water and wounded veterans ignored.
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »

Transgender teen can proceed with hormone treatment despite father's objections, B.C. court rulesThe judge said he was satisfied A.B. understood the benefits and risks of treatment and that postponing it further could result in A.B. trying to harm himself again 14?!?!?!?!?!? Absolutely disgusting. Makes me sick What is the legal definition of a 'minor'? Anyone (….in B.C.)?
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »