Former attorney-general and justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould fielded more than three hours worth of questioning from members of the House of Commons justice committee Wednesday after her opening testimony in which she said she was subjected to sustained and co-ordinated pressure to intervene in the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
Ms. Wilson-Raybould said she thinks it’s apparent from her opening remarks that she was concerned that she was shuffled out of justice and into veterans affairs because she decided she “would not take on SNC and the DPA.” Her response refers to a deferred prosecution agreement, under which the company would accept responsibility for the wrongdoing and pay a financial penalty, relinquish benefits gained from the wrongdoing and put in place compliance measures.Mr.
The December meeting Ms. Wilson-Raybould referenced was one of three meetings with Privy Council Clerk Michael Wernick.New Democrat MP Nathan Cullen picked up on an earlier line of questioning from Ms. Raitt. He asked Ms. Wilson-Raybould to confirm whether, in being asked to issue a directive on a specific case, she was being asked to do something “historic."
globepolitics On a lighter note, I was intrigued by the Puglaas testimony but shocked by the fact that no one wears dress shoes in Ottawa anymore. Come on Canada, stop shopping at Walmart for footwear.
globepolitics Trudeau has to resign after her testimony, Trudeau said “there’s an election coming and I’m an MP in QUE we have to find a solution” that’s POLITICAL INTERFERENCE and it’s a crime - Trudeau the Crime Minister demoted her then...what more proof do you need?
globepolitics And she did it admirably. Much respect to her!!
globepolitics
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New justice minister says it would have been appropriate for PMO to discuss SNC-Lavalin with Wilson-RaybouldDavid Lametti, who took over the justice and attorney general roles from Wilson-Raybould in a cabinet shuffle in early January, said the attorney general ‘is not an island’ who can’t talk to cabinet, government officials before deciding on a prosecution globepolitics O course it was appropriate ... was not the first time and certainly will not be the last ... Without newspapers getting the great unwashed up in social media arms there would be no story and thus, reporting jobs may be lost ... ................................................... globepolitics Read all of Wernicks testimony surrounding the 17th. He states it was 90% Indigenous framework. Was the other 10% SNC Lavalin? Was there a deal going down? He stated and emphasized she was the decider. Decider of what? Today 638 million announcement Urban housing. Coincidence? globepolitics But not to PRESSURE her to drop the prosecution, that’s OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and a crime under the Criminal Code - all Trudeau has to do is WAVE Client Lawyer Privilege, But he won’t, so he’s GUILTY...!!!!
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Jody Wilson-Raybould wasn’t pressured and is free to talk, says Canada’s top bureaucratMichael Wernick took opposition MPs to task for jumping on anonymous allegations to accuse the government of obstructing justice So he’s a lawyer? 🙄🤥 He doesn't get to tell Puglaas that she is free to speak She is a big girl and perfectly capable of making that decision on her own He tried deflecting the conversation knowing damn well that the issues he mentioned are not the focus or purpose of the committee
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Wilson-Raybould sought to limit PMO involvement in judicial appointmentsFormer justice minister set about depoliticizing how judges are appointed in Canada in 2015, with greater independence to screening committees, which caused internal debate between her and PMO Why would she feel the need to do that? Interesting. Sounds like JWR was on a power trip It is constitutionally entrenched that the PMO/PCO have a role in appointments. Justice Canada leads but as appointments are made by the whole cabinet so PMO/PCO need input and crucially to defend them in parliament.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »