In its earlier legal response to CPI’s suit, Vivint claimed that CPI had been deceptive by “defaming Vivint and deceiving customers about Vivint.”
But those statements are “lip service,” Eblen argues. He is now representing Alert 360, a home security company based in Oklahoma, in anThe CPI trial included testimony from former employees who claimed Vivint knew its “worst actors” were also its highest performers, he said. In court documents, former employees alleged Vivint “fired” people from Vivint Smart Home, only to hire them at Vivint Solar and eventually rehire them at Vivint Smart Home.
“Since it seemed the [Department of Justice], state licensing boards, and law enforcement couldn’t stop them, I decided it was time to do what I could to stop them,” Gill said. “Litigation in federal court seemed to be the last option.” Sales reps also asked customers for the name of someone they knew with a better credit history, the settlement alleged, and named that person as a co-signer without their knowledge or permission.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »