Well he has 2 sex offenders on the court..what can you expect..
Maybe they are just, you know, upholding the law.
WTH?
It's looking to me as if, maybe, Chief Justice Roberts has decided to defend the institutional legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Let's hope I'm right and let's hope RBG and Breyer make it to the next Democratic President.
Thank our lucky stars that we have a friend in Justice Roberts, a friend of objective jurisprudence first before all else.
Today's liberals yesterday's conservatives? Today's conservatives yesterday's racist moochers?
It isn't about 'siding with Liberals'. It's about adhering to the Rule of Law!
WritesTruths It won't last long.
sides with constitution an precedent is spelled wrong
Scotus The Chief Justice is weak and attempting to be relevant to all sides. He will reveal himself as a Federalists Society shill when he will side with the Kavanaugh Court (not Robert’s Court in supporting Trump’s Emergency Declaration. All Federalists will vote 👍MAGA? Nope.
Appointed because of his supposed conservatism, but evolving into his predecessor who was also considered conservative, Earl Warren!
Well! I must say that maybe he is going to be a fair and impartial Justice, guess time will tell!!! I hope I'm right!!!
Not that I like him, but Kavanaugh also sided with the liberals. He obviously doesn’t like it when folks thumb their noses at SCOTUS precedent. Hopefully he’ll think the same way about abortion rulings.
when you know what you do...sets precedent... and is beyond POLITICS... thanks Chief Justice.
If we take back senate and WH, conservatives on court will come to know what oversight is!
I prefer he agrees with Constitution over labeling anything not tRUMPANZE as 'LIBERAL'...or 'SOCIALIST'
Hopefully this is a trend and not a stunt.
Mental health is no joke
Now, we should finally relax for a while & court is now in balance. Thank you Judge Robert for your service & dedication to the cause of Justice.
THIS SHOWS YOU HOW EXTREME THE RIGHT WING LUNATIC FRINGE HAS DRAGGED THE GOP
The problem is that until the mid to late 1990s psychiatrists and psychologists were testifying people were 'likely to kill again' and as to their intellectual capabilities and never met, interviewed, or tested the defendants.
Liking CJSCOTUS!!
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »