US Supreme Court Declines to Halt Execution of Missouri Man With 'Severe Mental Illness'

  • 📰 commondreams
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

The right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday evening declined to halt Missouri's planned execution of 45-year-old Johnny Johnson by lethal injection.

Mr. Johnson has suffered from severe mental illness and cognitive impairments his entire life. He has organic brain disorder and experienced a brutally traumatic and adverse childhood that involved psychiatric hospitalizations, and suffers from schizophrenia that consistently features hallucinations, delusions, and psychotic disorganized thought. He was in the grips of active psychosis when he committed the offense for which he is scheduled to be executed.

There is extensive evidence that Mr. Johnson does not have a rational understanding of the reasons for his execution. As such, he is entitled by the Constitution to a"fair hearing" to assess his competency. This is true notwithstanding the Missouri Supreme Court's flawed ruling relying on a single affidavit by a prison therapist over the competency evaluation and report by a licensed psychiatrist.

After being released from a mental hospital in January 2002, Johnson was staying with family friends in Valley Park that July and killed their 6-year-old daughter, Casey Williamson. A jury found him guilty of first-degree murder, armed criminal action, kidnapping, and attempted rape in January 2005 and two months later a judge sentenced him to death.

"I never said I didn't want Johnny Johnson to die," he said."I would love to see him die a miserable death."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 530. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Letters to the Editor: Justice Alito says the Supreme Court is no place for ethics rulesReaders say that if the justices don't want Congress to regulate their behavior, we should consider other actions to protect ethics on the court.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert saysLegal experts explain how the legacy of Justice Clarence Thomas is often overlooked or disparaged by media and leftist critics who dislike his ideology.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court Justice Jackson's second error reveals another industry gone wokeSupreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's error during an affirmative action ruling exposed the woke insanity that has taken over the medical field.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Samuel Alito Inadvertently Made the Best Case for Supreme Court Ethics ReformAlito’s unabashed flouting of basic judicial ethics principles has compellingly underscored the critical need for a Supreme Court code of conduct.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Samuel Alito’s View on Supreme Court Reform: Thanks, But No ThanksThe conservative justice seems to believe that checks and balances don't apply to the high court, which has been plagued by conflict-of-interest scandals that have lit a fire under Democrats in the Senate.
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

GOP Lawsuit Asks Ohio Supreme Court to Block Abortion Rights MeasureThree days after the Ohio Secretary of State approved an abortion rights amendment on the November ballot, Republicans filed a lawsuit asking that the Ohio Supreme Court to block it from appearing.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »