Paxton also is accused of wrongly firing agency employees who first raised corruption allegations against him and for obstruction of justice related to
pending against him since 2015. He has denied any wrongdoing and characterized the impeachment as an illegal act perpetrated by opponents within his own party.from office “for an act the officer may have committed before the officer’s election to office.” The law does not clarify whether it is referring to the most recent election or the person’s first election to that particular office.The lawyers cited legal precedent, however, they say backs their interpretation of the law.
“Consistent with Texas law, Texas Supreme Court decisions, and this Court’s precedents, the prior-term doctrine squarely applies to this proceeding,” they wrote. “Indeed, the factual underpinnings for the Articles have been reported on for years and even served as the focal point of his opponents’ media campaigns during his most recent primary and general elections.
“Texas voters elected Attorney General Paxton despite those public allegations — so they have the last word.”Just one article of impeachment — dealing with Paxton’s request that lawmakers fund a $3.3 million whistleblower settlement with the employees who first raised the corruption complaints — relates to conduct that occurred this year, they added. That article must also be dismissed “for separate reasons to be addressed elsewhere,” the lawyers wrote.
Paxton’s legal team has filed several additional motions on which Patrick has not yet made a decision, including ones to
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FOX26Houston - 🏆 448. / 53 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »