NGN had previously argued that the suit should be tossed because the lawsuit was filed beyond the six-year limitation for bringing up a claim. Justice Timothy Fancourt said he had not seen any evidence that the Duke of Sussex was aware before the date he filed his suit “that NGN had done anything other than hack his mobile phone,”
reported. Thus, he can proceed over another claim he’s made—that the group unlawfully used private investigators to dig up dirt about him. A trial is set for January next year.that would stop members of the royal family from filing lawsuits against NGN in exchange for financial compensation and an apology. He also claimed that his brother, Prince William, managed to receive a “huge” sum as part of the agreement.
A spokesperson for NGN described the ruling as a “significant victory” that “substantially reduces the scope” of Harry’s legal claim. Buckingham Palace did not return the wire service’s messages seeking comment. An attorney not involved with the case told AP that the judge essentially threw out most of Harry’s claim. “On the face of it, his chances of winning those claims do not look good,” attorney Michael Gardner said. “This is but one of a number of very expensive privacy cases the Duke is currently pursuing in the High Court. If he loses he could be liable for literally millions of pounds in legal costs.”seeking £440,000 , which Fancourt is also expected to rule on later this year, AP reported.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »