Legitimacy of 'customer' in Supreme Court gay rights case raises ethical and legal flags

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The legitimacy of the customer “Stewart” in the Supreme Court ruling that a Christian graphic artist can refuse to make wedding websites for gay couples raises questions about how the case was allowed to proceed all the way to the nation’s highest court.

Stewart, who declined to give his last name for fear of harassment and threats, said he was incredibly surprised, adding he has been married to a woman for 15 years.It’s highly unlikely. The would-be customer’s request was not the basis for Smith’s original lawsuit, nor was it cited by the high court as the reason for ruling in her favor. Legal standing, or the right to bring a lawsuit, generally requires the person bringing the case to show that they have suffered some sort of harm.

“If there are other places where you can get standing, then legally speaking I don’t think it actually does make a difference,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School. While the revelation cannot change the decision, “it’s something that should’ve come up in the litigation,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley Law, “because then what the court should have done is say we have doubts about this, we can’t resolve it, we send it back to the federal district court.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Don’t believe the left’s misguided hype about the Christian creative Supreme Court rulingLast week’s blockbuster Supreme Court opinion, 303 Creative v. Elenis, has unleashed a fury of criticism from those who wrongly believe that a majority of the justices have condoned discrimination against gay-identified people.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court news: Roberts and Kavanaugh emerge as the court's most pivotal votesThe Supreme Court's completion of its recent term saw a range of sweeping decisions including the end of affirmative action in college admissions and curbing anti-discrimination laws.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Va. Supreme Court finds state improperly held inmateVirginia’s Supreme Court ordered the release of one of the hundreds of inmates who had been set to get out of prison early under a 2020 law expanding credit for good behavior.
Source: postlocal - 🏆 327. / 59 Read more »

Denise Maes: A long way from equality, the Supreme Court heavies our load'The Court ignored that racial inequality is not just yesterday’s problem. It remains a problem today and will persist unless intentional steps like affirmative action are taken,' Denise Maes writes
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »

Opinion: Glad that student loan forgiveness was spiked by Supreme CourtOpinion: Glad that student loan forgiveness was spiked by Supreme Court [Opinion]
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

FOX Faceoff: Recent Supreme Court decisionsSeveral Supreme Court decisions has the FOX Faceoff guys stirring.
Source: FOX26Houston - 🏆 448. / 53 Read more »