“The Sopranos” star posted a screen grab on his verified Instagram account with a caption that read, “After turning down invitations to appear on various news programs, i thought it best just to clarify: The post referred to here was a satirical and symbolic take on where blatantly discriminatory Supreme Court decisions are taking us as a nation: into utter division and possibly far worse.” “I believe in religious freedom, freedom of speech and the right for individuals to pursue happiness.
“I believe that all people regardless of race, religion, color, creed, gender or sexuality are entitled to freedom, equality, rights and protection under the laws of our nation. And i vehemently oppose hate, prejudice and bigotry and always have. Some people have not gotten the irony I was expressing so i thought i’d be more explicit.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Michael Imperioli says ‘bigots and homophobes’ forbidden from watching ‘Sopranos’“Thank you Supreme Court for allowing me to discriminate and exclude those who I don’t agree with and am opposed to. USA! USA!” In earnest, Michael Imperioli added, “hate and ignorance is not a legitimate point of view ... it’s called dehumanization.”
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »
Michael Imperioli Clarifies His Statement “To Forbid Bigots & Homophobes” From Watching His WorkMichael Imperioli is clarifying a statement he made following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling last week that a web designer could refuse to provide services for same-sex weddings. In his …
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
Michael Imperioli Post Clarifies Banning 'Bigots and Homophobes'Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 vote that website designer Lorie Smith had the right to refuse to provide services for same-sex weddings on the grounds that it would violate her religious faith – with the majority decision stating that Colorado's non-discrimination law couldn't force Smith to violate her Frist Amendment […]\n
Source: bleedingcool - 🏆 20. / 69 Read more »