The affirmative action doppelgangers on the Supreme Court

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 94%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A journalist who was at the Supreme Court on Thursday described the intense atmosphere in the wake of a conservative majority’s decision to strike down racial preferences in higher education admissions. As Justice Clarence Thomas read his concurring opinion aloud from the bench, the reporter…

A journalist who was at the Supreme Court on Thursday described the intense atmosphere in the wake of a conservative majority’s decision to strike down racial preferences in higher education admissions. As Justice Clarence Thomas read his concurring opinion aloud from the bench, the reporter captured a moment fit for the history books.

Jackson asks readers to “imagine” two hypothetical college applicants, one white and the other black. Affirmative action, she says, is about “acknowledging the seven generations’ worth of historical privileges and disadvantages that each of these applicants was born with” and thus penalizing the white person for things he never did. “History speaks,” she says. “In some form, it can be heard forever.

More importantly, he understands why so-called affirmative action is unconstitutional. His opinion wrecks Jackson’s claim that the 14th Amendment is “race-conscious” by quoting numerous officials and laws near the time of its passage that show a “colorblind” intent behind the push for equality. Jackson’s racial commentary is “constitutionally irrelevant,” he points out.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court defends Constitution and liberty with rejection of student loan plan, affirmative actionThis past week, the United States Supreme Court issued its final rulings for the session before entering summer recess.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »

Biden stands firm against Supreme Court expansion in 'Deadline' interviewBiden said he thinks the current Supreme Court is 'not normal' but called expanding the number of seats on it a 'mistake,' writes Jordan Rubin.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Nearly 1.4 million Texans could be impacted by U.S. Supreme Court decision blocking student loan forgivenessThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan is unconstitutional. The decision means that payments on full loan balances will resume in October, affecting nearly 1.4 million Texans.
Source: TexasTribune - 🏆 441. / 53 Read more »

Opinion | Supreme Court tosses nearly 50 years of progress on racial equityOpinion by Ruth Marcus: By ending affirmative action, justices put the country in reverse.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

How does the Supreme Court work?Exploring why some recent decisions have put a spotlight on the Supreme Court.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »

Local officials, leaders react to Supreme Court backing designer against same-sex marriageThe Supreme Court ruled Friday a Christain web designer had the right to refuse to work with same-sex couples on their wedding website. Leaders of Washington's LGBTQ community say they will work to ensure the state's laws continue to protect their rights after the ruling. Leaders of Washington's LGBTQ community say they will work to ensure the state's laws continue to protect their rights after the ruling.
Source: Mynorthwest - 🏆 438. / 53 Read more »