Advertisement
He added, “The University’s professed good intentions cannot excuse its outright racial discrimination any more than such intentions justified the now denounced arguments of slaveholders and segregationists.”Thomas’s many public statements and opinions on affirmative action before and during his time on the Supreme Court have been reexamined after Thursday’s rulings on race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina .
“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,” Jackson wrote. “But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”Thomas first gained recognition as a lawyer and assistant to then-Sen. John Danforth and was described inin 1980 as “a long-time supporter of Ronald Reagan, opposed to the minimum wage law, rent control, busing and affirmative action.
Thomas noted in his 1983 speech that while “too much posturing has taken place on issues such as affirmative action,” lingering problems surrounding equal employment opportunity for minorities and women needed to be solved.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »