“The finding of the court on the applicability or otherwise of sections 3 and 4 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act is highly questionable, particularly the requirement for public participation when a decision of this nature is taken, affecting a specified category of persons only. In this instance, the affected Zimbabwean nationals.
He said the HSF judgment also deals with matters relating to a sacrosanct principle of separation of powers. The minister believes this is another strong ground for appeal.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
EXPLAINER | What the two judgments mean for ZEP holders, home affairs dept and Motsoaledi | News24A full bench of the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria handed down judgments finding against Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi in two different matters involving the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit. | AlexMitchley
Source: News24 - 🏆 4. / 80 Read more »
ZEP ruling: The details of the court's findings against Motsoaledi | City PressHome Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi suffered a blow in court this week, when the High Court in Pretoria ruled that his decision to suspend the ZEP programme was “unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid”
Source: City_Press - 🏆 7. / 72 Read more »
Motsoaledi to appeal to ZEP ruling, Mzansi cheers on: “I like the sound of that”Home Affairs', Dr Aaron Motsoaledi plans to appeal the Pretoria High Court's decision to rule the termination of the Zimbabwean Exemption Permits unlawful.
Source: brieflyza - 🏆 10. / 68 Read more »