Justices Offer Competing Views on Race in Affirmative Action Opinions

In his concurring opinion, Thomas defended the “colorblind Constitution,” stating, “individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments.” He also said Jackson’s “race-infused world view” used “her broad observations about statistical relationships” to “label all blacks as victims.”Jackson accused the court’s conservative majority of announcing “‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat” with “let-them-eat-cake obliviousness.

” Responding to Thomas, she said his “prolonged attack” demonstrated “an obsession with race consciousness that far outstrips my or UNC’s holistic understanding that race can be a factor that affects applicants’ unique life experiences.” Notably, Jackson capitalized “black,” and Thomas did not.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justices Who Benefited From Affirmative Action Helped Decide Its FateTwo Supreme Court justices who decided the fate of race-conscious college admissions are themselves among the first products of affirmative action
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

How Supreme Court Justices Sparred on Affirmative ActionThe Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision outlawing affirmative action in higher education produced more than 200 pages of jousting between different camps of justices, a clash that reflects a broader societal debate about racial inequality.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Black justices battle over meaning of equality in affirmative action caseJustice Clarence Thomas on Thursday offered a majestic view of America waiting to be unshackled from the evils of racial discrimination that began with slavery, persisted through segregation and most recently manifested in affirmative action.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »