AOC ridiculed for viral take on legacy admissions following Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling

  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 87%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was mocked Thursday after she provided her take on the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling and suggested the high court isn't serious about its “ludicrous ‘colorblindness’ claims.'

faced an onslaught of criticism Thursday after she provided her take on the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling and suggested the high court isn't serious about its"ludicrous ‘colorblindness’ claims" or else it would have"abolished" legacy admissions.

NIKOLE HANNAH-JONES CALLS OUT 'RICH WHITE PEOPLE' AFTER SCOTUS RULING, ADDS CLARENCE THOMAS 'IRRELEVANT HERE' "This is how AOC thinks the court operates," Washington Free Beacon investigative reporter Joe Gabriel SimonsonRep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said Thursday that the Supreme Court"would have abolished legacy admissions" if the justices were serious about"their ludicrous 'colorblindness' claims."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 9. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Biden rips Supreme Court decision on race-based college admissions: ‘Not a normal court’President Biden delivered a speech Thursday condemning the Supreme Court's decision that the consideration of race by universities for admissions is unconstitutional.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Democracy advocates cheer unexpected Supreme Court election law winsThe conservative-led court rejected the most extreme version of a novel legal theory that could have prevented state supreme courts from exercising oversight of state lawmakers’ handling of redistricting, voter ID and other policies for federal elections.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects unchecked state legislature power over federal election rulesThe Supreme Court delivered a strong rejection of a controversial legal theory that threatened to upend state election laws nationwide and give state legislatures unchecked power over federal election rules in the case Moore v. Harper.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Alaska Supreme Court hears arguments in city of Valdez’s effort to unlock Hilcorp financial secretsThe attorney for the city argued that the public needs access to weigh the oil company’s ability to respond to a spill. Attorneys for the state and oil company said Valdez did not follow proper procedures before turning to the courts.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court backs man who sent female musician flood of unwanted messagesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out the stalking conviction of a Colorado man who sent a barrage of unwanted messages to a female musician in a case involving constitutional free speech protections, ruling that prosecutors had not shown he understood the
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects novel legislative theory, but leaves door open for 2024 election challengesThe U.S. Supreme Court shot down a controversial legal theory that could have changed the way elections are run across the country, but left the door open to more limited challenges that could increase its role in deciding voting disputes during the 2024 presidential election
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »