Opinion | The Supreme Court Wrestles the Rights Monster

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

From WSJopinion: Abortion devolved into two phrases—pro-life and pro-choice. But the public’s view of abortion was more nuanced. That nuance is now showing up in state statutes, writes DanHenninger.

Wonder Land: Americans don’t want to forfeit forever their views on abortion or other personal issues. Images: Reuters/Associated Press Composite: Mark Kelly

Like the Milan fashion show, the nine justices of the Supreme Court are saving their most stunning cases for last. Thursday and Friday likely will see the release of the Harvard and North Carolina affirmative action cases and the case out of Colorado pitting a website designer’s religious rights against gay rights. None of these rulings are likely to produce the furor of last year’sdecision overturning the constitutional right to an abortion, which sent thousands into the streets.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion: The Supreme Court's wise ruling on free speech and online threatsIn the case of an accused online stalker, the court adopted a compromise to both protect free speech and safeguard people from being threatened.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Opinion | The worst part about John Roberts’ celebrated Supreme Court rulingChief Justice John Roberts' opinion 'laid landmines for future elections by recalling the court’s infamous ruling in Bush v. Gore,' writes levinsonjessica
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Elections MuddleFrom WSJopinion: So much for the radical Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority rejected in Moore v. Harper the argument advanced by some conservatives that the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from reviewing Congressional maps and voting laws.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court says state lawmakers can’t just ignore state law when drawing voting districts | OpinionIf a state legislature could draw whatever congressional districts it wanted, it might have more freedom to affect the choice of state electors in presidential elections.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »

Opinion | Supreme Court’s affirmative action decision confirms what we already knew, and fearedThe Supreme Court's affirmative action decision is another manifestation of how conservative this court is, and how little regard it has for precedent, writes LevinsonJessica.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »