Thomson ReutersAn American flag waves in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 2, 2020. The liberal justices dissented with the opinion from the conservative-majority court.The justices ruled in favour of a group called Students for Fair Admissions, founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, in its appeal of lower court rulings upholding programs used at the two prestigious schools to foster a diverse student population.
Anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum departs after the U.S. Supreme Court heard appeals in two cases brought by an organization he founded on the legality of race-conscious admissions policies, on Oct. 31, 2022. "At the same time," Roberts went on, "as all parties agree, nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent that the decision "rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.
The group contended Harvard, a private university, violated Title VI of a landmark federal law called the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars discrimination based on race, colour or national origin under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: VOCMNEWS - 🏆 74. / 51 Read more »
Source: LegInsurrection - 🏆 3. / 95 Read more »
Source: TheTorontoSun - 🏆 23. / 68 Read more »
Source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Read more »
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »