to fly its flag at city hall when it had never turned down other organizations.
In Groff’s case, religious liberty scholars told the court that making allowances for the special needs of religious workers does not discriminate against others who do not have similar needs. Religious accommodations, they said, should be treated no differently than allowances for disability, pregnancy and family medical issues.Groff, an evangelical Christian and former missionary, joined the Postal Service in 2012 in Lancaster County, Pa.
That changed less than a year into his tenure, when the Postal Service entered an agreement with the online retail giant Amazon to deliver packages on Sundays. Groff was initially exempted from Sunday deliveries to observe the Sabbath, a day he reserved for worship and rest. But after the union representing postal workers created a new system for filling Sunday shifts, Groff was told he would have to be available.
His absences on Sundays led co-workers to quit, transfer or cover for him. Groff eventually decided to resign, concluding that was being forced to chose between his work as a mail carrier and his religious practice. He sued the Postal Service for discrimination.at the federal District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which said his refusal to work on Sundays had “actually imposed on his co-workers, disrupted the workplace and workflow, and diminished employee morale.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCPhiladelphia - 🏆 569. / 51 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »