What does the Supreme Court’s ban on affirmative action mean for California?

  • 📰 mercnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

California voters banned affirmative action in public university admissions in 1996 through Proposition 209, but Thursday’s ruling will force private schools such as Stanford and the Universi…

The Supreme Court has ruled against affirmative action, banning colleges and universities from considering race in student admissions.

Those ripple effects will extend across the country, requiring all colleges to disband use of race-conscious admission practices. In California, it’s a slightly different story: Affirmative action has been banned in the state’s public colleges for decades, since Proposition 209 struck down the practice for public employment, contracting and education in 1996.

“Undergraduate admissions are the entry-point to training our future leaders — our teachers, lawyers and doctors,” said Maria Ledesma, a professor and chair of the Department of Educational Leadership at San José State University. “This is going to leave a longstanding impact.” “Admissions should be based on merit, and I think that’s the best way forward because that’s what America was built on,” said Utkarsh Jain, the spokesperson of the UC Berkeley College Republicans. “If not, people working hard are being disenfranchised and disadvantaged when they’re applying to college.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 88. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court says state courts can review election law, rejects independent state legislator theoryThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state legislators are not the ultimate authority on how elections are conducted, reasoning that state courts can review election rules enacted by lawmakers.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules state courts can play role in policing federal electionsBREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan. The case would have left state legislatures virtually unchecked in making rules for federal elections.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Upholds State Courts’ Power to Prevent GerrymandersThe Supreme Court said legislatures drawing congressional districts are bound by election protections in state constitutions, dealing a blow to GOP aspirations to sideline state courts from overseeing federal elections
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules state courts can play role in policing federal electionsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan as excessively partisan under state law.
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Gives State Courts More Power Over Corporate DefendantsThe Supreme Court rejected a bid by Norfolk Southern to limit its state-court liability in states where it does relatively little business
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court affirmative action case: How California sees its impactA look at University of California admissions ahead of an expected Supreme Court decision that could ban affirmative action in university admissions.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »