, will go down in history as one of the landmark cases of the court, and marks a milestone in decades of affirmative action litigation.
The decision was a 6-3 split between conservative and liberal justices, with the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. Kagan is the former dean of Harvard Law School, and Jackson sat on Harvard’s Board of Overseers, recusing herself from that portion of the case.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects ‘independent state legislature’ theoryThe Supreme Court rejected a fringe legal theory that would have let states run elections with little judicial oversight. The 6-3 decision turns away a conservative push to empower state legislatures.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects controversial Trump-backed election law theory | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court said Tuesday that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not violate the elections clause of the US Constitution when it invalidated the state’s 2022 congressional map
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court upholds North Carolina ruling that congressional districts violated state lawThe Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan as excessively partisan under state law.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court says state courts can review election law, rejects independent state legislator theoryThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state legislators are not the ultimate authority on how elections are conducted, reasoning that state courts can review election rules enacted by lawmakers.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »