US Supreme Court strikes down university race-conscious admissions policies

  • 📰 STForeignDesk
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 71%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

It is a setback to affirmative action policies used to increase number of under-represented groups. Read more at straitstimes.com.

WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court on Thursday struck down race-conscious student admissions programmes currently used at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina .

The decision, powered by the court’s conservative justices with the liberal justices in dissent, was 6-3 against the University of North Carolina and 6-2 against Harvard. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson did not participate in the Harvard case. Many institutions of higher education, corporations and military leaders have long backed affirmative action on campuses.

Harvard and UNC have said they use race as only one factor in a host of individualised evaluations for admission without quotas – permissible under previous Supreme Court precedents. Many US conservatives and Republican elected officials have argued that giving advantages to one race is unconstitutional, regardless of the motivation or circumstances.Some have advanced the argument that remedial preferences are no longer needed because the US has moved beyond racist policies of the past such as segregation and is becoming increasingly diverse.

Students for Fair Admissions alleged that the adoption by UNC, a public university, of an admissions policy that is not race-neutral, violates the guarantee to equal protection of the law under the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court backs free speech rules in online stalking caseTrue threats are not protected by the US Constitution’s guarantee of free speech rights. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Source: STForeignDesk - 🏆 4. / 71 Read more »

Israel's Netanyahu to drop most contentious part of judicial revamp: ReportIt would have allowed the national legislature to overturn Supreme Court rulings. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Source: STForeignDesk - 🏆 4. / 71 Read more »

Amazon appeals to French court to scrap planned €3 book delivery feePARIS: Online retailer Amazon.com has appealed to France's highest administrative court to overturn part of a law seeking to charge a minimum €3 ($3.3) delivery fee for books purchased online, it said on Tuesday (Jun 26). Amazon France said the clause in the law, which stipulates that books ordered onlin
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »

Bosnian Serb lawmakers vote to suspend rulings of Bosnia's top courtSARAJEVO: Lawmakers in Bosnia's autonomous Serb Republic voted on Tuesday (Jun 27) to suspend rulings by Bosnia's constitutional court, a move described by experts as a 'legal secession' that is set to deepen political divisions in the volatile Balkan country. The region's separatist pro-Russian President
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »

Court says Trump must face New York civil fraud claims, tosses case against IvankaThe Republican front-runner for the 2024 presidential election has denied wrongdoing. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Source: STForeignDesk - 🏆 4. / 71 Read more »

Court says Trump must face New York civil fraud claims, tosses case against IvankaNEW YORK: A New York appeals court on Tuesday (Jun 27) rejected Donald Trump's bid to end the state attorney general's lawsuit accusing him and his family business of 'staggering' fraud, but dismisse
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »