. North Carolina Republicans brought the case after the state's Supreme Court struck down their partisan gerrymandered congressional map. They cited the fringe"independent state legislature" theory, which, in its most extreme form, claims the Constitution's elections clause gives state legislatures unfettered control over federal elections.
But the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed. The elections clause “does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review,” Roberts wrote, over dissent from Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.If ... the Supreme Court accepts the broadest version of the independent state legislature theory, then state lawmakers will, with few exceptions, have exclusive power to make decisions about federal elections.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules against GOP lawmakers in dispute over North Carolina's congressional mapThe Supreme Court rules against giving state legislatures unchecked control over federal elections, ruling against Republicans in North Carolina fighting for a congressional district map that would heavily favor their candidates.
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects GOP argument in North Carolina case that could have transformed US electionsThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state courts can act as a check on their legislatures in redistricting and other issues affecting federal elections, rejecting arguments by North Carolina Republicans that could have transformed contests for Congress and president. The justices by a 6-3 vote upheld a decision by North Carolina’s top court that struck down a congressional districting plan as excessively partisan under state law.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against North Carolina GOP in congressional map fightSCOTUS affirmed a decision by North Carolina's top court but rejected the so-called independent state legislature theory at issue in the case. The 6-3 decision held that the elections clause 'does not insulate state legislatures from...judicial review.'
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects GOP argument in North Carolina case that could have transformed US electionsThe North Carolina case attracted outsized attention because four conservative justices had suggested that the Supreme Court should rein in state courts in their oversight of elections for president and Congress.
Source: WTVYNews4 - 🏆 590. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects GOP claim that state lawmakers have full power over electionsThe Supreme Court's decision will make it harder for a state's dominant political party to gerrymander district voting maps to lock in control.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »