Generative AI is a minefield for copyright law

  • 📰 Moneyweb
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 77%

Law Law Headlines News

Should the artists whose art was scraped to train the models be compensated? Who owns the images that AI systems produce? Is the process of fine-tuning prompts for generative AI a form of authentic creative expression? Moneyweb AI CopyrightLaw

In 2022, an AI-generated work of art won the Colorado State Fair’s art competition. The artist, Jason Allen, had used Midjourney – a generative AI system trained on art scraped from the internet – to create the piece. The process was far from fully automated: Allen went through some 900 iterations over 80 hours to create and refine his submission.

Was that a form of infringement? Or was it a new form of “fair use,” a legal doctrine that permits the unlicensed use of protected works if they’re sufficiently transformed into something new? While AI systems do not contain literal copies of the training data, they do sometimes manage to recreate works from the training data, complicating this legal analysis.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

EDITORIAL | Time to deliver justice to judges drunk with powerIt is imperative courts maintain the rule of law, act impartially and ensure due process swiftly.
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »

Landlord ordered to restore defaulting tenants’ water and powerJohannesburg high court rules that SK Enterprise ‘took the law into their own hands’ in disconnection without a court order
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »