challenged the legality of the guidelines, arguing that the policy breached the Administrative Procedure Act and that they had standing because their states would incur greater law enforcement costs and a significant impact on social services due to the increase in illegal immigration that resulted. A district court found that the states did have standing and blocked the implementation of the policy.
Justice Alito, in his dissent, says that the majority"brushes aside a major precedent that directly controls the standing question, refuses to apply our established test for standing, disregards factual findings made by the District Court after a trial, and holds that the only limit on the power of a President to disobey a law like the important provision at issue is Congress’s power to employ the weapons of inter-branch warfare — withholding funds, impeachment and removal, etc.
In a statement, Mayorkas applauded the ruling and said the department"looks forward to reinstituting these Guidelines, which had been effectively applied by [ICE] officers to focus limited resources and enforcement actions on those who pose a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security."
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: FOXLA - 🏆 445. / 53 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Source: dothaneagle - 🏆 337. / 59 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »