Supreme Court upholds federal law used to prosecute people who encourage illegal immigration

  • 📰 WOKVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court has upheld a section of federal law used to prosecute people who encourage illegal immigration, ruling against a California man who offered adult adoptions he falsely claimed would lead to U.S. citizenship

on Friday upheld a section of federal law used to prosecute people who encourage illegal immigration, ruling against a California man who offered adult adoptions he falsely claimed would lead to U.S. citizenship.The case involves a section of federal immigration law that says a person who “encourages or induces” a non-citizen to come to or remain in the United States illegally can be punished by up to five years in prison.

Based on Hansen’s promises, officials say, people either came to or stayed in the United States in violation of the law, even though Hansen knew that the adult adoptions he was arranging would not lead to citizenship. The government says that at least 471 people paid him between $550 and $10,000 each and that in total he collected more than $1.8 million.

Hansen was ultimately convicted of encouragement charges as well as fraud charges. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison for the encouragement charges and another 20 years on the fraud charges. But a federal appeals court ruled that the law on encouragement is overbroad and violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment and overturned just those convictions..

Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 247. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Affirmative action, student debt among pending 2023 Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court will announce more decisions in cases it has heard since October this week, which could include whether colleges and universities can consider race in making admission decisions and if Biden’s student-loan forgiveness program is lawful.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Native American tribes say Supreme Court challenge was never just about foster kidsNative Americans say the Supreme Court has reaffirmed their power to withstand threats from states in many areas.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court still hasn't decided on Biden's student loan forgivenessMillions of Americans with student debt are awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of a Biden administration policy to forgive large amounts of loans.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Maryland Supreme Court limits gun ballistics evidence in criminal proceedingsIn a 4-3 opinion, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled to end the long-standing practice of calling in firearms experts during criminal proceedings to testify that a particular gun fired a specific bullet.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

PolitiFact - Why doesn’t the Supreme Court have a formal code of ethics?Federal laws, some of which were recently tightened, require Supreme Court justices to report gifts valued at more than a few hundred dollars. But there are no official ethics standards for the Supreme Court as there are for lower courts.
Source: PolitiFact - 🏆 17. / 71 Read more »

The enduring damage of the Supreme Court's transgender rulingConservatives have long criticized federal judges, especially on the Supreme Court, who interpret the Constitution in ways that are convenient for liberal ideology by making huge leaps of logic as to the meaning of the law. Many were shockingly displeased when Republican justices did so in 2020.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »