United States v. Rahimi
, which struck down the federal law temporarily prohibiting persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. To come into play, the law requires that the person be “subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner.” Such an order typically requires a court finding that the person “represents a credible threat” to a domestic partner.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Companies Brace for Supreme Court Ruling That Could Prompt Scrutiny of Diversity InitiativesA looming affirmative action ruling has prompted companies to consider how it might affect their own diversity policies
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Affirmative action, student debt among pending 2023 Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court will announce more decisions in cases it has heard since October this week, which could include whether colleges and universities can consider race in making admission decisions and if Biden’s student-loan forgiveness program is lawful.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Native American tribes say Supreme Court challenge was never just about foster kidsNative Americans say the Supreme Court has reaffirmed their power to withstand threats from states in many areas.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »
Why the Supreme Court still hasn't decided on Biden's student loan forgivenessMillions of Americans with student debt are awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of a Biden administration policy to forgive large amounts of loans.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Maryland Supreme Court limits gun ballistics evidence in criminal proceedingsIn a 4-3 opinion, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled to end the long-standing practice of calling in firearms experts during criminal proceedings to testify that a particular gun fired a specific bullet.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »