By GEOFF MULVIHILL, KIMBERLEE KRUESI and CLAIRE SAVAGE
Last summer, as women and medical providers began to navigate a landscape without legal protection for abortion, Nancy Davis’ doctors advised her to terminate her pregnancy because the fetus she was carrying was expected to die soon after birth. While some states scrambled to pass new restrictions, others already had enacted laws that were designed to take effect if the court overturned Roe.
CHOICES Center for Reproductive Health had for decades treated patients seeking abortions in Memphis, Tennessee. After Tennessee’s abortion ban kicked in last year, the clinic opened an outpost three hours away, in Carbondale, Illinois .
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Gov. Ron DeSantis used secretive panel to flip state Supreme CourtFor decades, the ambitions of Florida’s Republican governors were stymied by the liberal-leaning state Supreme Court. That is, until Ron DeSantis was elected.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Three momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' on the Supreme CourtThree momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' impact Supreme Court. Justices' attitudes are based on original meaning of Constitution, not interpretation.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court's ruling on religion case—What to knowThe Supreme Court will soon rule in a case involving a Christian mail carrier who refused to work on Sundays. Here's what to know:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Racial MisfireFrom WSJopinion: A Supreme Court decision upholding the Indian Child Welfare Act means federal law will continue to elevate tribal prerogatives and racial criteria above the welfare of vulnerable Native American children
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »