How the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action changes the future of college

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 62 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

If race-conscious admissions falls, some schools are expected to use household incomes and ZIP codes to enroll diverse classes.

The high court’s decision hinges on two cases where Students for Fair Admissions is challenging race-conscious practices at Harvard and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. | Kevin Dietsch/Getty ImagesThe Supreme Court seems destined to end its term with a big rollback of the tool colleges employ to boost racial diversity on their campuses.

The high court’s decision hinges on two cases where Students for Fair Admissions is challenging race-conscious practices at Harvard and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — the nation’s oldest private and public universities. “The question before the court is whether or not you can use race as a plus-factor in admissions,” said Hinojosa, an attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. It’s that particular “tool” for diversifying freshman classes that’s facing criticism, he said, not the goal.

After the initiative was adopted, underrepresented student enrollment “dropped precipitously at [the University of California], and dropped by 50 percent or more at UC’s most selective campuses,” the university systemTo stem their losses, the University of California implemented race-neutral measures, including outreach programs to low-income students and students from families with little or no college experience.

Lower courts have given the practice a pass but Students for Fair Admissions has pointed out that Asian American usually have lower personal rating scores than Black and Latino applicants, which are based in part on letters of recommendation and an essay.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Racial MisfireFrom WSJopinion: A Supreme Court decision upholding the Indian Child Welfare Act means federal law will continue to elevate tribal prerogatives and racial criteria above the welfare of vulnerable Native American children
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court's ruling on religion case—What to knowThe Supreme Court will soon rule in a case involving a Christian mail carrier who refused to work on Sundays. Here's what to know:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Three momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' on the Supreme CourtThree momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' impact Supreme Court. Justices' attitudes are based on original meaning of Constitution, not interpretation.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Christian college’s challenge over transgender dormsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a Christian college's challenge to the federal government's directive on housing for transgender people.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »