Supreme Court limits federal prisoners' ability to bring some post-conviction challenges | CNN Politics

  • 📰 CNN
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 20 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 95%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a federal prisoner who argued he should be able to challenge his 27-year sentence for firearms possession based on changes in the law since his trial.

The court’s decision will make it harder for federal prisoners to bring certain types of post-conviction challenges. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the 6-3 opinion in the case. The three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented.

The court held that the government has to prove the defendant knew he was still a felon at the time of his new offense in order to convict him. Jones appealed in federal court hoping to wipe away his felon in possession of a firearm conviction. He cited the Rehaif decision in his petition, noting that the Supreme Court had changed the rules. Lower courts ruled against him.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court's ruling on religion case—What to knowThe Supreme Court will soon rule in a case involving a Christian mail carrier who refused to work on Sundays. Here's what to know:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Racial MisfireFrom WSJopinion: A Supreme Court decision upholding the Indian Child Welfare Act means federal law will continue to elevate tribal prerogatives and racial criteria above the welfare of vulnerable Native American children
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court revives South Carolina Planned Parenthood defunding caseThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out a lower court ruling that blocked South Carolina from ending public funding to Planned Parenthood, giving the Republican-governed state another chance to defend its bid to deprive the reproductive healthcare and abortion provider of government money.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Marijuana scent enough to warrant police search, Wisconsin Supreme Court rulesA car smelling like marijuana is enough for police in Wisconsin to justify searching a person in the vehicle, even though substances legal in the state can smell the same, the state Supreme Court said on Tuesday.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »