Last year, the court issued a series of rulingsAmong the cases the Supreme Court will be issuing rulings on before the term ends are challenges to race-conscious admission policies — or affirmative action — at Harvard, which is a private institution, and the University of North Carolina, which is a state school. These cases are known as Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Additionally, the court will decide whether a Colorado web designer is legally allowed to refuse to create wedding websites for same-sex couples . A state law would fine her for discrimination if she did so, but the designer is arguing that it’s a violation of her First Amendment rights to be forced to create something to which she objects.Signs calling on Justice Clarence Thomas to resign are seen on Capitol Hill in April.
about conservative Justice Samuel Alito. According to the outlet, Alito and prominent conservative legal activist Leonard Leo went on an unreported luxury fishing trip with a Republican billionaire who had business before the court.an op-ed in the Wall Street JournalThe Alito news was only the latest report to come out in recent months about the court’s conservative justices.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court news: Five major opinions justices could release as soon as ThursdayThe Supreme Court has yet to issue opinions in 18 cases heard this term, with less than two weeks left ahead of the high court's summer recess.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Three momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' on the Supreme CourtThree momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' impact Supreme Court. Justices' attitudes are based on original meaning of Constitution, not interpretation.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court's ruling on religion case—What to knowThe Supreme Court will soon rule in a case involving a Christian mail carrier who refused to work on Sundays. Here's what to know:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Racial MisfireFrom WSJopinion: A Supreme Court decision upholding the Indian Child Welfare Act means federal law will continue to elevate tribal prerogatives and racial criteria above the welfare of vulnerable Native American children
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »