Justices are bound by federal disclosure laws for gifts above a certain monetary value, but the Supreme Court does not have an ethical code like the ones followed by the executive and legislative branches.A series of reports from ProPublica detailing lavish trips Justice Clarence Thomas accepted from GOP donor Harlan Crow has fueled Democratic calls for reform on the federal bench.
Without addressing the merit of each case, he said Chief Justice John Roberts should take steps to address the perception of conflicts of interest. Roberts, in declining to testify before the Senate, sent a letter to Durbin in April outlining the ethical standards the high court already holds itself to, yet the five-page document did not satisfy Democrats on the Judiciary Committee.
Sen. John Cornyn , a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, framed the ProPublica report as part of a long campaign against the court's conservative justices. He invoked Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer warning Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, both Trump appointees, last year that they would"pay the price" if they voted to roll back abortion access.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rejects Christian college’s challenge over transgender dormsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a Christian college's challenge to the federal government's directive on housing for transgender people.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Three momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' on the Supreme CourtThree momentous consequences of a 'conservative majority' impact Supreme Court. Justices' attitudes are based on original meaning of Constitution, not interpretation.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court's ruling on religion case—What to knowThe Supreme Court will soon rule in a case involving a Christian mail carrier who refused to work on Sundays. Here's what to know:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Racial MisfireFrom WSJopinion: A Supreme Court decision upholding the Indian Child Welfare Act means federal law will continue to elevate tribal prerogatives and racial criteria above the welfare of vulnerable Native American children
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »