Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action could reshape the college admissions process

  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on a case that would decide the future of race-based affirmative action in high education across the country.

Protesters gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as affirmative action cases involving Harvard and University of North Carolina admissions are heard by the court in Washington, October 31, 2022.expected to issue a decision

The nation's highest court heard two major cases in October 2022 on affirmative action, one on race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard University, the nation's oldest private college, and one from the University of North Carolina, the nation's oldest public university. Colleges and universities often want prospective students to submit high school transcripts, standardized test scores, letters of recommendation, personal essays and a list of extracurricular activities when considering admissions, but can have their own application requirements in place.

Proponents for affirmative action in higher education rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on October 31, 2022 in Washington, DC.Harvard, UNC and other schools have considered race as a factor in their admission processes, and that it's an indispensable tool for creating a diverse campus.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 471. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Did RFK Jr. Win a Supreme Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination?❌ No, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did not win a Supreme Court case against mandatory vaccination.
Source: snopes - 🏆 228. / 63 Read more »

Mystery powder letters sent to Kansas Republicans, Trump, Supreme Court Justice ThomasWASHINGTON — A series of threatening letters containing a mysterious white powder is raising concerns that Republican lawmakers in Kansas and across the nation who received them are being targeted by someone cryptically calling themselves 'your secret despirer,' according to authorities and recipients of the letters.
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Ketanji Brown Jackson 'likely done' writing Supreme Court decisions this termSCOTUS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has likely finished writing decisions on the merits this term after writing her sixth majority opinion last week. With 18 cases left to decide this term, Jackson is the justice with the most authored opinions thus far.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court declines appeal from Christian school fighting transgender housingThe Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a Christian college in Missouri that sued the Biden administration over its decision to shield transgender people from housing discrimination.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment Tuesday in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966. A federal appeals court rejected the class-action claims. The Supreme Court’s action leaves that ruling in place.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »