The infighting on Trump’s defense team has left him searching for new attorneys able to fight his case in Florida, where the Justice Department last week hit him with 37 counts of criminal misconduct related to his handling of classified documents.The lawyers who remain, as well as some who have left Trump’s service, have also pointed fingers at Justice Department officials who they say engaged in unethical behavior to secure charges against Trump.
Corcoran was ordered to testify before a grand jury in March after the court ruled in favor of prosecutors who sought to invoke the crime-fraud exception, which states that a client’s communications with his or her attorney are no longer off-limits if the client tries to enlist an attorney in criminal activity.
Woodward said in a court filing that Jay Bratt, a top Justice Department official with a leading role in the documents investigation, mentioned during an interview that he knew Woodward had applied for a superior court judgeship in Washington, D.C. In his filing, Woodward said he interpreted the comments in context as a threat to his career prospects if he did not get his client, Nauta, to cooperate with prosecutors.
D’Antuono has since left the FBI for the private sector. But his testimony could factor into a defense narrative that paints the Justice Department as needlessly aggressive in the Trump case while following standard protocol in similar ones.
For her part, Bobb told investigators that Corcoran drafted the statement, told her the search had been conducted, and asked her to sign it. She said she signed it based on the information provided to her by Corcoran and reportedly requested that a disclaimer be added to the document to reflect that she was swearing the statement to be true “to the best of my knowledge.”
Second, D’Antuono, the former FBI official, has testified to the House Judiciary Committee that the Justice Department broke from standard procedure by allowing Bratt to oversee the initial part of the investigation rather than assigning it to a U.S. attorney. Why Justice Department officials, under Bratt’s supervision, began to suspect that classified material remained at Mar-a-Lago remains unclear. Much of the affidavit supporting the search warrant that preceded the raid is still redacted.
Known for his loyalty to the former president, Epshteyn is said to have painted a far rosier picture of the investigation than more seasoned lawyers believed was accurate.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »