What the possible end to race-conscious admissions means for Texas universities

  • 📰 KPRC2
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 76 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Here’s what you need to know ahead of the U.S. Supreme Court’s expected ruling on two cases challenging the policy commonly known as affirmative action in college admissions.

Sign up for The Brief

This time, legal and education policy experts are preparing for the court’s conservative majority to possibly put an end to the use of race in college admissions, which would change how some universities select their students. As universities await the Supreme Court decision, here are a few things to know about what the end of race-conscious admissions in higher education could mean for Texas:In the past, the Supreme Court has banned racial quota systems and said schools cannot admit students to correct systemic racism or give an advantage specifically to minority students.

In 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against using race in admissions, which banned universities in its jurisdiction, including Texas, from using affirmative action in college admissions for a few years. The Supreme Court took a different stance in 2003 when it ruled the University of Michigan could consider race in its law school admissions, nullifying the 5th Circuit’s earlier decision.

Over time, A&M has grown by tens of thousands of students, with large gains in its Hispanic and Asian populations. But Black student enrollment has largely remained flat. Meanwhile, studies have shown the Top 10% PlanUnlike Texas’ public universities, many private schools in the state still consider race in admissions, including Rice University in Houston, where university leaders already pledged a commitment to continue their diversity efforts regardless of the Supreme Court’s decision.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 80. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Liberal Supreme Court journalists admit incompetence, prescribe propaganda and harassment of justices'Liberal reporters who cover the Supreme Court don’t know what they are doing. To fix this, they need to be much more hostile toward conservative justices and even more propagandistic in their coverage.' -markgjudge
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

The Next Republican President’s Supreme Court Picks Will Be Far Worse Than Trump’sThe next batch of appointees are going to make Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch look like RINOs.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

How Alabama Democrats could blow their Supreme Court victory'This is a party built to lose competitive elections,' columnist WarOnDumb writes of the dysfunctional Alabama Democratic Party. 'And the US Supreme Court just gave it a new one to lose.'
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »

The Supreme Court’s secular establishment: 60 years laterOn June 17, 1963, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Abington School District v. Schempp. Schools in Pennsylvania had opened their days with a Bible reading and the Lord’s Prayer. The court in this case struck down such practices as violating the First Amendment’s establishment clause,…
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »