Shira A. Scheindlin: If the Supreme Court abolishes affirmative action, here’s what women need to do

Although debates around affirmative action have typically focused on people of color, the policy has also applied to gender, and women have been among affirmative action’s greatest beneficiaries. Now, after decades of allowing these programs in college admissions, the Supreme Court appears poised to weaken or dismantle efforts to make higher education more available to members of historically underrepresented minority groups.

Opponents also falsely claim that students of color are being admitted to fill racial quotas, depriving white students of the chance to obtain a coveted spot. But affirmative action, as practiced today, does not discriminate against one group in favor of another. Last August, more than 60 major American companies, including Apple, Google, Starbucks and United Airlines, filed a legal brief with the Supreme Court urging it to protect affirmative action. Those companies said the policy was a critical tool for creating a pipeline to diverse workforces and boardrooms. Similarly, an alliance of over 300 law firms filed a brief underscoring the importance of developing diverse leaders equipped with the skills to thrive in the global marketplace.

Moreover, exposing future leaders to diverse perspectives and experiences produces benefits that are fundamental to a functioning democracy, ranging from better problem-solving to reduced prejudice and increased empathy.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

John Roberts Just Told Congress How to Fix Bad Supreme Court DecisionsCongress has the authority to pass enforcement legislation to push back on Supreme Court rulings that whittle away bedrock fundamental rights.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

How a pending Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action could affect the scientific workforceA decision is due shortly on two related cases involving the admissions practices at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. To better understand what’s at stake, ScienceInsider outlines seven things to know. ⬇️
Source: NewsfromScience - 🏆 515. / 51 Read more »

If the Supreme Court kills affirmative action, we can still make colleges diverse | OpinionWhen this year’s decision is issued, solely playing defense in the courts will be unwise.
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flagThe Supreme Court said Monday it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court won't review North Carolina's decision to nix license plates with Confederate flagThe Supreme Court says it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court won't review North Carolina's decision to nix license plates with Confederate flagThe Supreme Court says it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag. The court did not comment Monday in declining to hear the case. The dispute stems from North Carolina’s 2021 decision to stop issuing specialty license plates bearing the insignia of the North Carolina chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. North Carolina says the plates “have the potential to offend those who view them.” The chapter says the state’s decision violated state and federal law. The Supreme Court ruled in 2015 in a similar case that Texas could limit the content of license plates because they're state property.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »