What does the Presidential Records Act say, and how does it apply to Trump?

  • 📰 CBSNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Trump and some of his allies have mischaracterized the law governing presidential records, according to legal experts and the federal agency charged with preserving them.

was unsealed last week, former President Donald Trump and some of his allies have repeatedly mischaracterized a law known as the Presidential Records Act, according to legal experts and the federal agency charged with preserving White House records.on Truth Social after the indictment was revealed, referring to his decision to retain dozens of boxes of documents and other material from his time in the White House.

The law governs records of the president, vice president and certain parts of the Executive Office of the President, such as the National Security Council and the Council of Economic Advisers. It lays out the requirements for the maintenance, access and preservation of information during and after a presidency.

Since presidential records are U.S. government property, a former president has to receive permission from the archivist to display presidential records, such as in a presidential library, which are operated and maintained by the National Archives, according to the report. "After his presidency, TRUMP was not authorized to possess or retain classified documents," the indictment said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 87. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump allies cite Clinton email probe to attack classified records case, but there are big differencesArguments that the Justice Decision's in 2016 not to bring charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her handling of classified information is a double standard with federal indictments former President Donald Trump now faces overlook abundant factual and legal differences -- chiefly relating to intent, state of mind and deliberate acts of obstruction -- that limit the value of any such comparisons.
Source: dailyherald - 🏆 317. / 59 Read more »

Trump allies cite Clinton email probe to attack classified records caseAs former President Donald Trump prepares for a momentous court appearance Tuesday on charges related to the hoarding of top-secret documents, Republican allies are amplifying, without evidence, claims that he is the target of a political prosecution.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »