UIR have insisted the deal is unfair to smaller tracks and that HRI takes a disproportionate amount of the revenue generated. Their preference is for a €100,000 per fixture offer from Arena Racing Company and want the freedom for racecourses to negotiate their own rights.
However, under legislation, all negotiations for authorised racecourses must be carried out by HRI’s media rights committee and on Friday the UIR spokesman, Kilbeggan boss, Paddy Dunican, said legislative changed is needed. “We believe Section 10 of the 2001 Act is unconstitutional,” said Dunican who also rejected reports arising from a recent UIR appearance in front of the joint-Oireachtas Agriculture Committee that the ARC offer wouldn’t generate as much revenue for the tracks compared to the SIS/RMG deal.
“The ARC offer is substantially higher and more secure for small racecourses,” he added. “UIR is also focused on the entire entertainment package with dwindling racecourse attendances transferring their betting interests to racing channels and online etc.” The long-running dispute was examined too recently by the Dáil Public Accounts Committee who asked HRI to consider appointing an independent arbitrator on the matter, a step that has been welcomed by UIR.HRI has said it wants to get the five UIR tracks back in the loop and eventually sign the SIS/RMG deal. It’s chief executive, Suzanne Eade, who was notably critical of UIR when the HRI board unanimously approved that deal last month, has said she would rather have them “onside.